Monthly Archive for February, 2009

Los Alamos Monitor: “Frustrations with Valles Caldera Erupt Into Public Debate” (Part Two)

By DAVE MENICUCCI, Special to the Monitor

[This is the second of a two-part series on problems and solutions at the Valles Caldera National Preserve.]

There are few places that can engender public passions as does the Valles Caldera National Preserve. Tom Ribe, head of the watchdog group, Caldera Action, sees it almost as a personal issue. “A group of us fought for years to bring the Baca Ranch into the public fold and now that we have it, we are not going to let it fail,” he said.

Under Ribe’s leadership, Caldera Action is developing proposals for a new approach to managing the preserve.

Ribe explained that they are seeking to “completely restructure the preserve, eliminate the board of trustees, and put the operation under another government agency, one that can aptly manage it with regular annual appropriations from the government.”

One possibility, said Ribe, is the National Park Service, which operates many national preserves in the U.S. These preserves allow fee-based hunting, fishing, and other recreational activities, many of which currently occur on the Valles Caldera. “It is a proven, successful management concept,” Ribe said.

However, the one stumbling block may be grazing. It is unclear whether the Park Service National Preserves can allow sustained grazing, and no Park Service Preserve currently operates as a designated “working ranch,” a stipulation in the Caldera’s founding legislation and a desirable feature for some people.

Virgil Trujillo, a Northern NM cattle rancher and a newly appointed Valles Caldera Trustee, stated firmly “that there can be no final resolution at the preserve without some accommodation for grazing,” especially involving the families in surrounding areas.

“All the ranchers want is some grazing access on the preserve. We are only talking about perhaps a couple of thousand head,” he explained.

The preserve has tried to satisfy this need. According to the preserve’s manager, Dennis Trujillo, in 2005 the preserve ran a two-year Conservation Stewardship Program to help local ranchers “to rest their lands.”

The program was not extended and no formal written report was published.

However, this stewardship program followed the general theme of a “grass bank.”

A grass bank is an area of public land that is lightly grazed. Ranchers with leased public properties that have been stressed by drought or other natural events are allowed to temporarily graze the grass bank lands, thus allowing their stressed properties to recover naturally.

It is uncertain whether such a concept would be applicable to a Park Service National Preserve.

William B. Keleher, an Albuquerque attorney who has recently stepped down as Valles Caldera Trust chair, believes radical solutions are not needed.

“The critical problem is the self-sufficiency mandate. It drives many of the preserve’s actions and creates the need to carefully control access in order to collect fees. If that part of the preserve’s operational structure can be eliminated with regular congressional funding, I think that the current management model will work,” he said.

Some people are skeptical of such a simplified solution. Dorothy Hoard, a resident of Los Alamos who has worked on Jemez district issues for many decades, believes that a change of management – especially one that puts the Valles Caldera under clear federal control – is essential to assure true public accountability.

“Under the current structure, the board of trustees is accountable to nobody except the Secretary of Agriculture, who is beyond the influence of the public,” Hoard said. “With a federal management system, such as the one at Bandelier, these managers are directly accountable to the people. The public can seek redress to grievances through their congressional delegates. Congress is the funding source, so the agencies pay heed.”

Many people believe that the preserve’s scientific work is a notable success and should not be disturbed, and perhaps even enhanced. Bob Parmenter, the preserve’s chief scientist, has demonstrated steady advancement toward the creation of self-sustaining science programs.

“We have made incredible progress in the past year in attracting world-class institutions to do research on the preserve,” he said. “These researchers not only contribute to the body of scientific knowledge in archeology, biology, geology and other areas, their contributions assist our operations because they share new findings with us. Best of all, they generally pay their own way, as their scientific grant objectives overlap with preserve management needs.”

But some have voiced cautions. Carlos Salazar, a life-long Rio Arriba rancher with multi-generational ranching heritage, explained.

“We support good science, but there are times where more practical solutions might be better than the scientific ones. For example, in some parts of the Valles Caldera cattle might more efficiently remove excess grass rather than burning, as some are proposing. It would provide economic benefits, too.”

Hunters and fishers are also suggesting new approaches to sporting activities on the preserve. Oscar Simpson, of the N.M. Wildlife Federation, believes that the preserve’s self sufficiency mandate is distorting management decisions regarding game management.

“There is continued pressure to make money, so they look for ways to sell expensive hunts. But this is public property, not a private ranch. The public has a right to use it. Valle Vidal is a better model for game management on a preserve,” he said emphatically. Valle Vidal is similar in size to the preserve and is located in Northeast N.M.

It is overseen by the Carson National Forest as a multi-use, public area.

Dick Brackett, a local fisherman and investment counselor, offers some simple advice to improve the fishing program. “Stop chauffeuring people to the Rio San Antonio. Fishermen can drive their own vehicles and it would provide them nearby shelter in case of lightning.

“This kind of excessive, government bureaucracy adds no value to the fishing experience and can be easily eliminated. And it would immediately benefit the bottom line,” he said.

Keleher counsels that “balance is the key to a long-term and stable solution.”

He believes that before any final action, the needs of the various constituents need to be weighed carefully. His desires may soon come to fruition as many people, including some in the N.M. Legislature, are urging Congress to convene hearings in Northern New Mexico concerning the future of the Valles Caldera.

 

Los Alamos Monitor: “Frustrations with Valles Caldera Erupt Into Public Debate” (Part One)

By DAVE MENICUCCI, Special to the Monitor

Dorothy Hoard, a long-time resident of Los Alamos, has charted the fate of the Valles Caldera National Preserve.  In 2000 she saw trouble.

“As soon as I read the founding legislation, I knew it would fail,” she said recently.  “And now it is happening.  They will never be financially self-sufficient – a critical requirement – because you can’t profit from publicly-owned natural-resource assets.”

The Valles Caldera is at a crossroads.  In recent months an intense public debate has erupted over the preserve’s management and direction.

Aflurry of articles, guest columns and editorials has appeared in the Monitor and the Albuquerque Journal.  In a recent Monitor report, Valles Caldera officials admitted the current path to self-sustainability may be not viable.  A Journal editorial suggested that a new management approach is needed.

Defining the problem is the initial step to a solution.  William B. Keleher has recently stepped down as Valles Caldera Trust Chair, a post he held for two years.  “Access was the number one complaint and the board worked diligently to address it,” he said.  He suggested that the National Environmental Policy Act “created restrictions that slowed progress, sometimes to a halt.”

Tom Ribe, an ecologist and head of Caldera Action, a watchdog group, disagrees.

“Access cannot be held hostage to NEPA.  All national parks comply with NEPA, and they host millions of visitors a year,” he said.

In fact, the nearby Bandelier National Monument, operating on a budget of around $2.5 million, hosts nearly 250,000 visitors per year.  In contrast, in 2008 the preserve hosted around 15,000 visitors and operated on about a $3.75 million budget.  The preserve’s property is about three times the size of Bandelier’s.

But Keleher countered with an example.  “I wanted to do the Rim Trail project,” he said, “but complex NEPA requirements and possible over-interpretation of the regulations created obstacles.  It frustrated me.”

The Rim Trail is an idea that Hoard has promoted for over 20 years.  She explained that it would “stitch together some existing trails and roads along with new ones, thus making up a contiguous, 80 mile hiking trail along the Caldera rim.”

Since the trail’s proposed route would traverse various public lands, including the National Forest and Bandelier, there would be numerous issues to be addressed. Hoard and her associates produced hundreds of pages in detailed reports about the trail and gave the preserve a summary report as the foundation for the project.

“We were always told that it was a good idea but that the preserve didn’t have their management documents in place,” she said. “They are no closer now than they were in 2001.  That is what is so frustrating.”

Cattle ranching is perhaps the preserve’s most contentious issue and access rights are at the center of the controversy.  On one side are the cattle ranchers, many of whom live adjacent to the preserve’s northern perimeter and lease forest allotments for their cattle.  Cattle ranching plays a prominent role in the culture and traditions of the area and many residents resent not having reasonable access to the lush grasses of the preserve’s northern valleys.

On the other side are groups such as the WildEarth Guardians, an environmental organization whose mission is to protect and restore wildlife and wild places.  Their official position is that grazing should be eliminated from the preserve and public access should be expanded.

In the middle are the local Indian tribes, such as Jemez, that claim a thousand-year-old cultural and religious connection to the land.  Along with an opportunity for livestock grazing, these people simply ask for respect and controlled access to ancestral hunting and religious areas.

According to Paul Tosa, an ex-Jemez-Pueblo governor, requests for access used to be granted.

Last year about 2000 steers were grazed on the preserve by a single rancher selected in a competitive bid process.

Carlos Salazar, a life-long Rio Arriba rancher with multi-generational ranching heritage, speaks fervently on this subject.

“We run small family ranches.  There are probably not 2000 head among all the grazing allotments in this area, so we could not bid.  The Valles Caldera has not been a good neighbor because they have not met with us to understand our legitimate right to parts of the Valles Caldera based on the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.”

The Treaty, signed by the US and Mexican Governments in 1848, agreed to the succession of ownership rights of Mexican citizens who lived in the land areas ceded to the US at the cessation of the Mexican-American war.

The value and costs of grazing are at issue.  John Horning, director of the WildEarth Guardian’s N.M. office, said that they “have not seen conclusive evidence of the value of cattle grazing and there are many studies documenting problems.”

Tony Valdez, of the Abiquiu County Extension Service, disagrees and suggested that “properly managed cattle grazing can stimulate new grass shoots that are favored by elk.”

Much of the disagreement about grazing stems from the preserve’s founding legislation that requires it to be a “working ranch” but does not clearly define the term.

To Virgil Trujillo a long-time cattle rancher in Northern N.M. and a newly appointed Valles Caldera Trustee, it means “cattle ranching.”  To Ribe, it’s a “science and education ranch.”

The frustrations regarding access are as old as the preserve.  Joan and Gary Salzman, a White Rock couple who published a popular N.M. hiking book, said that they abandoned the preserve many years ago.

“It’s nice,” Joan, said “but it is not so nice as to justify the restrictions and costs to hike there.”

Bill Stamm, of the N.M. Mountain Club, a large 55-year old hiking and climbing organization, said that after the preserve’s creation the club offered its volunteer services to implement recreational programs.

“We were rebuffed,” he said sadly, “and we never went back.”

Hunting and fishing programs generate a large portion of the earned revenue on the preserve and have produced repeat customers.  But as the allure has waned, critics have emerged.

Oscar Simpson, of the New Mexico Wildlife Federation, challenges some operational practices.

“It is a failed experiment.  You can’t privatize wildlife on a public property.  And you can’t succeed in the long run by babysitting hunters.  They don’t like it and it is wasteful.”

Dick Brackett, a local fly fisherman and investment consultant, sees excessive overhead in the Rio San Antonio fishing program.

“Chauffeuring fishers from the staging area to the stream is outrageously expensive and unnecessary.  The fishing is good, but not good enough to justify the cumbersome operation.”

In December, 2008, the Government Accountability Office began conducting an audit of the preserve.  Although the auditors have not revealed their sources, many people were interviewed.

Their report is anxiously awaited by a battery of critics who are forming plans to redirect the Valles Caldera.

NEXT: Part two will explore some ideas for solving the problems of the preserve.

 

Bill introduced to urge the federal government to change the management system at the Valles Caldera National Preserve

On February 16, N.M. State Senator Tim Eichenberg (D-Bernalillo) introduced Senate Joint Memorial Bill 49 into the New Mexico State Senate:

 

“REQUESTING THAT CONGRESS BE URGED TO HOLD HEARINGS ON A NEW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE VALLES CALDERA NATIONAL PRESERVE.”


SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL 49
49TH LEGISLATURE – STATE OF NEW MEXICO – FIRST SESSION, 2009
INTRODUCED BY
Tim Eichenberg

 

 

WHEREAS, the Valles Caldera national preserve is one of New Mexico’s most
spectacular places and important wildlife habitats, consisting of eighty-nine
thousand acres of forest, high-mountain grassland and clear streams nestled into the
caldera of an ancient volcano; and
WHEREAS, hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation are important parts of the way
of life in New Mexico; and
WHEREAS, accessible and protected public lands benefit local economies by
offering a higher quality of life that attracts tourism and high-wage jobs; and
WHEREAS, the current management experiment at the Valles Caldera national
preserve is based on a system set up for the Presidio, an urban area located in San
Francisco, California; and
WHEREAS, it has become clear that the experimental management system for the
Valles Caldera national preserve will never generate adequate funding without
developing, and thereby destroying, the Valles Caldera itself; and
WHEREAS, the current experimental management system has failed to provide
adequate access to the public for responsible use and enjoyment of the area; and
WHEREAS, a new management system would improve opportunity for the public to
responsibly enjoy the Valles Caldera national preserve, thereby benefiting all
residents and helping the local economy; and
WHEREAS, a new management system would expand access to hunting, fishing and
outdoor recreational opportunities for all residents regardless of financial means;
and
WHEREAS, a new management system would improve natural resource management at
the Valles Caldera national preserve and put it on more solid financial footing,
ensuring that this spectacular place can be enjoyed by present and future
generations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
that congress be urged to hold hearings as soon as possible on the establishment of
a new management system for the Valles Caldera national preserve, in which the
United States forest service, the national park service or the United States fish
and wildlife service provide management to improve responsible public access, expand
hunting, fishing and outdoor recreational opportunities for the public and place the
Valles Caldera national preserve on firm financial footing so that present and
future generations can enjoy and experience this spectacular place and benefits to
the economy can be fully realized; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the New
Mexico congressional delegation and the chief clerks of the United States house of
representatives and senate for distribution to the appropriate committees.